Murk and Gloom
Written by: Steve Orlando
Art by: Giovanni Timpano
Colours by: Flavio Dispenza
Letters by: Taylor Esposito
Published by: Dynamite Entertainment/DC Comics
Cover Price: $3.99
I must admit, this took me by surprise. After all, it was only last week that the last issue of the first mini-series featuring Batman and The Shadow came out and now, here we are, and there’s a new title to consider. This one has a title that puts The Shadow first, though, and, unlike the previous series, it’s set in New York City which is The Shadow’s stomping ground as opposed to Gotham. There’s no Scott Snyder this time around, with Steve Orlando assuming full responsibility for the writing. Gone, too, is Riley Rossmo’s artwork; artist for this set of issues is Giovanni Timpano whose style isn’t quite so distinctive. The last series finished with Batman and the Shadow having somewhat uneasily worked together to save Shamba-La, although the cost of its salvation was its place in our reality. While the differences between them haven’t been properly reconciled, the two vigilantes had at least managed to come to a working agreement. The stage seemed to have been set for their relationship to develop and change. Let’s see if that’s what we get here…
We start with Professor Pyg. I like Pyg. He’s an interesting villain with a creepy MO and Orlando uses him pretty well here. Unusually, Pyg is in New York, which means, even more unusually, so is Batman who appears with Damian to foil his plans. The fight is visually impressive, although the dialogue is decidedly off in parts – particularly with Damian. (“No matter how often I threaten retribution”? Er… no.) There’s some somewhat confusing dialogue about Pyg trying to restore his “toys” that someone else has “made… perfect puppets” and a mention of the ‘Silent Seven’, which Batman decides to follow up as a matter of urgency, despite the abundance of forensic evidence laying around the place in the form of Pyg’s dollotrons. Oh, well. Pyg’s dialogue is difficult to interpret at times. I know he’s an obsessive, unhinged character, but that’s all the more reason to be careful about throwing out enigmatic speech bubbles like confetti at a wedding. Still, the main gist appears to be that someone’s been interfering with Pyg’s ‘work’ and Pyg only wanted to restore things back to the way they should be.
Not that that stops him from moonlighting as Alfred in the next scene. Or is he? Oh, you writers and your… ambiguity. This whole concept of The Shadow assuming the identities of Batman’s friends and acquaintances in order to guide and shape his development was first introduced in the previous series and reinforced during that series’ final scene. As a concept, it has a certain attraction, I suppose, but the devil, as always, is in the details. Having the page end with Alfred’s speech bubbles turning all Shadow-esque and rectangular is all fine and dandy, but it raises questions that the creative team appears to have no interest in answering. Like, how does this actually work? Is The Shadow impersonating Alfred? (In which case where’s the real one at this moment? If Batman refers to conversations that he thinks he’s had with Alfred but of which Alfred has no knowledge, won’t the world’s greatest detective realize something’s up?) Is he possessing Alfred? Or stopping time to step in as Alfred for just a few moments? I don’t know. And that’s the problem. I’d quite like to know why The Shadow would choose this particular moment to talk to Bruce – and about Damian, no less – but Steve Orlando doesn’t want to tell me. Or even consider the question.
That lack of clarity is not helped by the issue’s final scene – a confrontation between an oddly-written Damian and a ‘Batman’ whose true nature is none too subtly hinted at by some portentous white on black word balloons. In some respects, this verbal – and then physical – spat is representative of the problems with this issue as a whole. Damian’s cleverness, verbal wit and general attitude are on display, but the details of Damian’s language and speech patterns are decidedly off. In fact, everything is ‘off’ in this scene, although, admittedly, our ‘Batman’ is meant to feel wrong. The issue ends with a bold, dramatic flourish that has considerably less impact than its writer probably intended. Or perhaps, like the reader, he’s just happy to have reached the end of the issue.
There are some intriguing moments here. Batman’s investigation into the Silent Seven throws up old newspaper stories that feature other Dynamite properties like Miss Fury and The Black Terror. The implication that all you need to do to cross over into a different reality is move from one city to the next (something that any Manchester United fan working in Liverpool experiences on a regular basis) is a neat and understated way of dealing with the meeting of the two franchises. The Shadow’s brief time on the page is possibly the highlight of the issue, Orlando’s Pyg dialogue excesses aside. That final confrontation between Damian and ‘Batman’ – overlong, over-scripted and overwrought – is an odd way to end the issue, though. Consequently, it’s difficult to give this opening installment an unreserved recommendation.
Bits and Pieces:
Moments of class and excitement occasionally dazzle in this opening issue, but the story is too muddled and the dialogue at times too awkward to make it as entertaining as it could – or should – be. Timpano’s art is, on the whole, good. At times it is excellent; at others, merely adequate. There are, to be fair, enough mysteries here to keep this reader interested, but the opaqueness of the writing makes them too often a chore to encounter. Let’s hope for better things next issue.
I'm liking this one better than the previous mini (so far), but it REALLY feels like we're sort of being dropped into the middle of a story. . .like this should actually be the third issue. Maybe it's just me, but it feels a bit strange.
ReplyDeleteI think that's a valid point. The first section with Pyg, despite some good artwork, comes off as a bit confusing. I'd like to know exactly what Pyg found in or on his dollotrons that made him cause havoc in New York City. The time to clarify that was in the scene between Pyg and The Shadow - and all we got was a shocked Shadow and a far too opaque Pyg. And I really didn't like that ending...
ReplyDeleteOther than that, it was fab! :D